Honest comparison
ReaperCI vs Dokploy
Dokploy is a feature-rich deployment platform for applications, Compose stacks, databases, and services. ReaperCI is narrower: it is built around CI evidence, protected promotion, governed agents, and live VPS operations.
Vendor information checked July 11, 2026. Dokploy’s official pricing page currently displays Hobby at $4.50/month per server and Startup starting at $15/month, with monthly/yearly controls. Verify billing terms and current features before buying.
Choose Dokploy when
- You want application, Compose, database, preview, domain, and service management in one PaaS interface.
- One-click templates, terminal access, database backups, and Docker Swarm support matter.
- Low per-server control-plane pricing is the deciding factor.
Choose ReaperCI when
- BuildKit CI, retained artifacts, cache controls, commit statuses, and deployment policy must share one system.
- Agents need scoped identities and cannot be allowed to bypass production approval.
- You prefer allowlisted remote operations over unrestricted terminal access from the managed cloud.
Capability by capability
| Area | ReaperCI | Dokploy |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | CI-to-production governance and operations | Application and infrastructure deployment |
| Built-in CI | BuildKit steps, dependencies, resources, caches, artifacts | Multiple build types and CI/CD integration |
| Databases | Out of scope | Deployment, management, and backups |
| Preview delivery | Connected-provider previews with policy | Preview deployments |
| Remote access model | Outbound mTLS connector with typed allowlist | SSH, terminal, and platform operations |
| Agent interface | CLI, MCP, OpenAPI, structured triage | REST API, CLI, Swagger |
| Production rollback | Exact captured image IDs with health policy | Registry-based rollback |
Where Dokploy is stronger
Dokploy has greater PaaS breadth today: databases, one-click templates, Swarm, terminal access, domain management, and a long list of notification and service features. ReaperCI does not claim those capabilities.
Where ReaperCI is different
ReaperCI’s design starts with a governed build and ends with runtime evidence. Human approvals remain authoritative across UI, CLI, API, and MCP; every agent action has a service identity; and the connector accepts typed operations rather than arbitrary managed-cloud shell commands.
Bottom line
Pick Dokploy for broad self-hosted PaaS convenience. Pick ReaperCI when your differentiator is a controlled Git-to-production loop with agents in the workflow and humans retaining authority.
View private beta status